Training delivery
Continue through the connected RSM pathway and its current scope.
Contributor standards
RSM Instructors and Contributors
Review expectations for instructor competence, contributor disclosure, technical review and accurate public biographies.
Foundation
Verified qualifications
Biographies and course roles should rely on confirmed education, experience, licences, credentials and current organizational relationships.
Application
Defined contribution
Instructor, author, reviewer, advisor and sponsor roles should not be blurred.
Accountability
Ongoing currency
Technical contributors need continuing learning and update responsibilities when course or guidance versions change.
Connected pathways
Continue through the RSM system.
Frequently asked questions
Scope and accountability
Is this page a government or regulatory service?
No. RSM provides independent education and organizational resources.
How is this content kept current?
RSM uses review dates, source verification and correction routes appropriate to the subject.
Can this page replace professional or legal advice?
No. Applicable authorities, qualified professionals and contracts remain responsible for project-specific decisions.
How can an error be reported?
Use the contact, technical-feedback or programme-update route that best matches the issue.
Published: July 19, 2026 Last reviewed: July 19, 2026
RSM provides independent educational and organizational resources. Confirm current authority and professional requirements for specific decisions.
Next steps
Understand RSM before relying on it
Review mandate, governance and the boundaries of RSM’s role.