Technical feedback
Continue through the connected RSM pathway and its current scope.

Corrections process
Report and review material corrections to RSM technical, programme, credential, research and public-education content.
Foundation
Safety, active deadlines, eligibility, fees, credential requirements and technical errors require prompt review.

Application
Major changes should record the affected page, date, previous statement, corrected statement and reason.

Accountability
Where a correction changes required learning or an active application decision, RSM should notify subscribers or candidates through the appropriate channel.

Connected pathways
Frequently asked questions
No. RSM provides independent education and organizational resources.
RSM uses review dates, source verification and correction routes appropriate to the subject.
No. Applicable authorities, qualified professionals and contracts remain responsible for project-specific decisions.
Use the contact, technical-feedback or programme-update route that best matches the issue.
Published: July 19, 2026 Last reviewed: July 19, 2026
RSM provides independent educational and organizational resources. Confirm current authority and professional requirements for specific decisions.
Next steps
Review mandate, governance and the boundaries of RSM’s role.